Nonprofit News by Soft Trac

Update Your Mailing Addresses

July 24th, 2007 by Susan Low Saadat

Don’t you just hate it when you spend hours preparing, stuffing, sealing, and delivering a mailing to the post office and then never knowing whether your mail ever reached its destination because you didn’t pay the higher rate that would ensure the mailing would come back with its new address?
One solution, obviously, is to do a first class mailing every year to ensure that your addresses are up to date.
Another solution, which may end up being easier and less expensive in the long run is to use a National Change of Address mailing service. Sage Software actually offers one. You can run a utility from within your Fundraising 50 software and then send the file off to the vendor and they’ll update the addresses for you. Then, you can load the info back into your system. Simple! Call Sage Software 1-800-574-5772 to find out more about this service.
Happy mailing.
Susan


Grant Funding: How do we get funded?

July 18th, 2007 by Susan Campbell

Below is a great article I read in a recent publication and Grant Funding.

Do you know why your organization did not receive the funds you were seeking in the last grant you applied for? Is this your first grant proposal? Follow these simple tips to get the grant funding your organization needs to fulfill its mission:

Be clear and specific. When you write the case statement or the abstract it is essential that the reviewer understands the outcomes your organization will reach if funding is granted. The most successful grant applicants are those who are able to instill a sense of validity in the effort and method in very straightforward terms. If a foundation or grantor can’t tell from your case statement why it is important to fund you or how you are going to accomplish your goals, you probably won’t get funded.

Be realistic. One of the most common things I’ve seen in grant applications is extremely ambitious goals with ambiguous plans to fulfill them. When you are reviewing stacks of applicants it’s very easy to eliminate an applicant based on goals that just seem unrealistic. For example, I’ve reviewed grants for medical research where the program necessitates the participants are required to travel upwards of 30 miles each day one way for a 6 week period. It just is not realistic to expect participants to travel 60 miles 5 days a week, for 6 weeks straight. When you are writing your applications keep in mind it’s real people who are reading them, and they want the best for your constituency too.

Read all of the directions.This tip seems easy enough but it is critical that you follow the directions exactly as specified. Don’t forget to include any details or items they request in the grant process. The quickest way to be disqualified from the pool is to submit something incomplete.

Know your funder. Who else have they funded in the past? What kind of projects are they interested in supporting? The better you know what they are looking for, the more likely you are to position your application to appeal to their interests.

Peer review. If it’s at all possible, try to get more then one set of eyes on the grant application. It’s always a good idea to have others in your organization, board or perhaps even the population you are trying to serve, review the material. Others may notice gaps in the application that don’t seem obvious to you. Keep in mind, the grant reviewer may know little to nothing about your organization or your mission efforts. It’s great to have that fresh pair of eyes take a look before you finally submit it.

Be proactive.Don’t wait till the last minute. It’s very clear which applications are thrown together at the last minute and which ones are prepared in a timely manner. It’s easy as a reviewer to infer that if the application was last minute the funding may be treated with that same regard.

Grant writing can be a long, tedious, and sometimes discouraging process.
These are just a few tips, to consider along the way. Good luck!


Charitable Giving Stats for 2005-2006

July 11th, 2007 by Susan Low Saadat

Just a little tidbit I ran across in the Chronicle of Philanthropy that I wanted to share with you fundraising folks. According to Giving USA Foundation, giving by individuals during the period 2005-2006 reached $222.89 billion, bequests accounted for 22.91 billion, foundations gave 36.50 billion and by corporations 12.72 billion.
Giving through individuals and foundations increased from 2005 to 2006 (1.2% and 9.1% respectively), while bequest and corporate giving was down during the same period (-5.1% and -10.5% respectively).
How do these numbers compare to your organization’s experiences during that period? Do your fundraising efforts mirror the potential of these constituencies?
I’d welcome your comments and observations.


Sage MIP Fund Accounting

July 10th, 2007 by Susan Campbell

Welcome to the Blog site for Sage MIP Fund Accounting, where you’ll find articles of interest.